United Kingdom

Non-decent homes

Key points

top

Graph 1: Over time

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Graph 2: By tenure

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Graph 3: By income

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Graph 4: By region

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Graph 5: By type of area

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Why this indicator was originally chosen

The conditions in which people live affect their health, relations between household members, and the development of children.

top

Definitions and data sources

'Non-decent' homes are those which do not meet the government's standard for 'decent homes' whereby housing should: be above a statutory minimum standard (i.e. be fit for habitation); provide a reasonable degree of thermal comfort; be in a reasonable state of repair; and provide reasonably modern facilities and services.  In 2006, the government changed the definitions for the first two of these criteria, in particular replacing the previous minimum standard criterion as the statutory element by a newly defined Housing and Safety Rating System.  The net effect of this change was to increase the number of homes classified as 'non decent'.  Data for 2007 onwards is only available using the new definition, whilst data for 2005 and earlier is only available using the old definition.

The first graph shows the proportion of homes deemed to be 'non-decent', with the data shown separately by tenure.  The data for 2007 onwards uses the new definition of 'non decency', the data for 2005 and earlier uses the old definition, and the data for 2006 is shown for both definitions.

The second graph shows, for the latest year, the shares of 'non-decent' homes in each tenure.

The third graph shows how the proportion of homes that are 'non-decent' varies by the income of household.  Note that the allocation of households to income quintiles uses 'equivalised household income' after deducting housing costs, which means that the household incomes have been adjusted to put them on a like-for-like basis given the size and composition of the households.  This means that the results are somewhat different than those in some other publications which use either unadjusted household incomes or incomes before deducting housing costs.

The fourth graph shows how the proportion of homes that are 'non-decent' varies by region.

The fifth graph shows how the proportion of homes that are 'non-decent' varies by type of area using the government's 2004 classification system for small areas, which (from most rural through to urban) classifies areas as 'hamlet and isolated dwellings', 'village', 'small town and fringe' and 'urban', where 'urban' is any settlement of more than 10,000 people.  Note that there is an alternative classification system which could have been used, where the surveyor of the property allocates it to one of six categories, three of which are rural.  The results using the two alternative classification systems are different, but show a broadly similar pattern.

To improve its statistical reliability, the data in the third to fifth graphs is the average for the latest three years.

The data source for all the graphs is the the stock dataset from the English Housing Survey (EHS) and relates to England.

Overall adequacy of the indicator: medium.  EHS is a well-established, regular government survey, designed to be nationally representative but there is no direct link with the subject of poverty and social exclusion.

top

External links

top

Relevant 2007 Public Service Agreements

Overall aim:  Increase long-term housing supply and affordability

Lead department

Department for Communities and Local Government

Official national targets

Increase the number of net additional homes provided per annum to 240,000 by 2016.

Increase the number of gross affordable homes provided per annum to 70,000 by 2010-11 including 45,000 social homes.

Halve the number of households in temporary accommodation to 50,500 households by 2010.

By March 2011, 80% of local planning authorities to have adopted the necessary Development Plan Documents, in accordance with their agreed Local Development Scheme.

Other indicators of progress

Trends in affordability.

Efficiency rating of new homes.

Previous 2004 targets

By 2010, bring all social housing into decent condition with most of this improvement taking place in deprived areas, and for vulnerable households in the private sector, including families with children, increase the proportion who live in homes that are in decent condition.

Eliminate fuel poverty in vulnerable households in England by 2010 in line with the Government's Fuel Poverty Strategy objective Joint with the department for Trade and Industry.

top

The numbers

Graph 1

DefinitionYear Private rented Social rented Owner occupied All tenures
Old definition1996 62% 53% 40% 45%
2001 51% 39% 29% 33%
2003 48% 35% 28% 31%
2004 43% 31% 27% 29%
200541% 29% 25% 27%
200640% 29% 24% 27%
        
New definition200647% 29% 35% 35%
200745% 29% 34% 35%
200844% 27% 32% 33%
200941% 23% 29% 30%

Graph 2

Millions
Private rented Social rented Owner occupied
1.5M 0.8M 4.4M

Graph 3

Poorest fifth 35%
2nd 33%
Middle fifth32%
4th 30%
Richest fifth 31%

Graph 4

East 30%
East Midlands 32%
London 33%
North East 23%
North West 34%
South East 31%
South West 39%
West Midlands 33%
Yorkshire and The Humber 34%

Graph 5

Hamlets and isolated dwellings53%
Villages46%
Small towns and fringe31%
Urban31%

 

top