United Kingdom

Without a bank account

Key points

top

Graph 1: Over time

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Graph 2: By type of account

View Graph as PDF (resizeable)   Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG

top

Why this indicator was originally chosen

It is becoming increasingly important for people to have the benefits of modern financial services.  A range of other benefits and conveniences become available with access to even simple financial services.  For example, lack of a bank account can mean higher prices for basic utilities than those paying by either cheque or direct debit, labour market disadvantage (employers tend to expect to pay wages directly into accounts), and limited access to credit.

top

Definitions and data sources

The first graph shows the proportion of households without a bank, building society or any other kind of account.  The data is split to show households in the poorest fifth of the income distribution and for households on average incomes (middle fifth of the income distribution) separately.  Income is household disposable income, equivalised (adjusted) to take account of household composition and is measured after deducting housing costs.

As the first graph shows, the proportion of households without an account has fallen sharply in recent years.  This fall has largely coincided with the introduction of two new types of account, namely basic bank accounts and post office card accounts (POCAs).  Some people argue that these new types of account, particularly the post office card account, should not be considered to be true accounts as they have only limited functionality (e.g. to avoid the account going into overdraft, it does not allow direct debits to be set up).  In this context, the second graph shows, for differing levels of household income, the proportion of households with only a basic bank account or a post office card account.  Note that such an analysis was not possible for years prior to 2005/06.  Also note that the small number of households with both a basic bank account and a post office card account but no other accounts are included in the 'basic bank account only' category.

The data source for both graphs is the Family Resources Survey (FRS).  The data relates to Great Britain (FRS did not cover Northern Ireland prior to 2002/03).  As well as bank and building society accounts, the figures also count any savings or investment accounts as well as post office card accounts but do not include stocks and shares, premium bonds, gilts, Save As You Earn arrangements or Credit Unions.  It is important to note that the proportions in both graphs are proportions of households, not families or individuals (for both of which, the proportions would be higher).

Overall adequacy of the indicator: medium.  FRS is probably the most representative of the surveys that gather information on the extent to which people have bank and other types of account but the inclusion in recent years of people with post office card accounts only is arguably distorting the trends over time.

top

External links

top

Relevant 2007 Public Service Agreements

None directly relevant.

top

The numbers

Graph 1

Year Poorest households Households with average incomes
1994/95 23% 5%
1995/96 23% 5%
1996/97 24% 5%
1997/98 23% 5%
1998/99 22% 4%
1999/00 23% 4%
2000/01 22% 4%
2001/02 20% 4%
2002/03 19% 5%
2003/04 16% 4%
2004/05 9% 3%
2005/066% 3%
2006/077% 3%
2007/086% 3%
2008/095% 3%

Graph 2

Household income group No account Post Office Card Account only Basic bank account only
Poorest fifth6% 5% 5%
2nd4% 3% 3%
Households with average incomes3% 1% 1%
4th3% `% 1%
Richest fifth2% 0% 0%

top