United Kingdom
Insecure at work
Key points
- Throughout most of the last decade, almost half of the men, and a third of the women, making a new claim for Jobseeker's Allowance were last claiming this benefit less than six months previously. In other words, almost half of men who lose their job, and a third of women, had had that job for less than six months. This shows the short-term nature of the jobs that many unemployed people go into.
- In the first quarter of 2009, these proportions fell substantially. This is not, however, because of a fall in the numbers making a new claim who were last claiming less than six months ago ((i.e. the numerator in the proportions above). Indeed these numbers rose substantially. Rather it is because the total number of new claims (i.e. the denominator in the proportions above) rose at an even faster rate (almost doubling between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009).
- The vast majority of part-time employees – 85% – do not want a full-time job. By contrast, only 25% of temporary employees do not want a permanent job. This suggests that, whereas part-time employment is generally a positive choice, temporary employment is often not.
- At 1.4 million, the number of people in temporary contracts is somewhat lower the a decade ago, when the figure stood at 1.7 million.
- The proportion of workers belonging to a trade union is lower among low-paid employees than among any other pay group. Only one in seven workers earning less than £7 an hour belong to a trade union compared with around two-fifths of those earning £10 to £20 an hour.
Graph 1: Job insecurity (proportions)
View Graph as PDF (resizeable) Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG
Graph 2: Job insecurity (numbers)
View Graph as PDF (resizeable) Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG
Graph 3: Temporary/part-time
View Graph as PDF (resizeable) Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG
Graph 4: Temporary contracts
View Graph as PDF (resizeable) Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG
Graph 5: Union membership
View Graph as PDF (resizeable) Right click to save large version of Graph as PNG
Why this indicator was originally chosen
Deregulation of the labour market has made it easier for employers both to take workers on and to lay them off. If employers face few barriers or disincentives to take workers on, then the overall level of employment should increase as long as skill levels in the labour force meet employer demands. However, employer flexibility also creates insecurity of employment for a large section of the workforce. Frequent movements in and out of employment, indeed in and out of low-paid work, is the normal experience of many workers, predominantly those with below average skill levels.
The chosen indicator of work insecurity is 'the proportion of people making a new claim for unemployment benefit who were last claiming less than six months ago.
Definitions and data sources
The first graph tackles insecurity at work through the issue of people who find themselves taking a succession of jobs interspersed with periods of unemployment. It shows the probability that someone who makes a new claim for Jobseeker's Allowance was last claiming that benefit less than six months previously. This is effectively the same as the proportion of people losing work who have been in that work less than six months. Figures are shown separately for men and women. The data relates to Great Britain and, for each year, is taken from the first quarter of the Joint Unemployment and Vacancies Operating System (JUVOS) cohort.
The second graph shows the same data but as actual numbers rather than as a proportion of new claimants for Jobseeker's Allowance. In times of reasonably constant unemployment, this graph would not add much value but it does provide extra information at a time of rising unemployment (as is the case in 2009). So, for example, the proportions in the first graph fell significantly in 2009 but, as the second graph shows, this is not because the numerator (i.e. the numbers in the second graph) fell but because the denominator (i.e. the total number of new claims for Jobseeker's Allowance) rose.
The third graph shows the principal reasons that people give for taking part-time work or temporary work. In each case, the main point of interest is those taking these forms of work who would prefer, respectively, full-time or permanent work.
The fourth graph shows the number of temporary workers who are of working age. A temporary employee is one who said that his/her main job is non-permanent in one of the following ways: fixed period contracts; agency temping; casual work; seasonal work; and other temporary work.
The fifth graph shows the proportion of people currently employed who are members of a trade union or staff association, with the data shown separately by level of pay.
The data source for the third to fifth graphs is the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and relates to the United Kingdom. In the third and fourth graphs, the data is the average for the latest three years. The figures in the fifth graph are for the fourth quarter of the latest year (the data is only collected in the fourth quarter).
Overall adequacy of the indicator: medium. While the claimant count data is sound, the narrow definition of unemployment that it represents means that it understates the extent of short-term working interspersed with spells of joblessness.
External links
See the Joseph Rowntree Foundation 'findings' on job insecurity and pathways through unemployment.
Relevant 2007 Public Service Agreements
None directly relevant.
The numbers
Graphs 1 and 2
| Year | All data is for the first quarter in the stated year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportions | Numbers (thousands) | |||
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| 1990 | 37% | 28% | 186K | 66K |
| 1991 | 30% | 24% | 216K | 72K |
| 1992 | 35% | 29% | 250K | 85K |
| 1993 | 39% | 31% | 240K | 83K |
| 1994 | 43% | 33% | 263K | 89K |
| 1995 | 45% | 34% | 265K | 84K |
| 1996 | 43% | 33% | 244K | 78K |
| 1997 | 49% | 38% | 260K | 83K |
| 1998 | 48% | 36% | 242K | 78K |
| 1999 | 46% | 36% | 219K | 68K |
| 2000 | 46% | 35% | 200K | 60K |
| 2001 | 47% | 35% | 215K | 62K |
| 2002 | 44% | 34% | 201K | 60K |
| 2003 | 44% | 34% | 196K | 61K |
| 2004 | 45% | 34% | 188K | 56K |
| 2005 | 45% | 34% | 176K | 54K |
| 2006 | 44% | 32% | 169K | 51K |
| 2007 | 49% | 36% | 185K | 58K |
| 2008 | 47% | 35% | 189K | 58K |
| 2009 | 38% | 28% | 267K | 81K |
Graph 3
| Reason | Part-time employees | Temporary employees |
|---|---|---|
| Could not find | 12% | 27% |
| Did not want | 84% | 27% |
| Other reasons | 3% | 46% |
Graph 4
| Year | Temporary employees (thousands) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | All | |
| 1997 | 800 | 970 | 1,770 |
| 1998 | 790 | 950 | 1,730 |
| 1999 | 780 | 900 | 1,680 |
| 2000 | 780 | 920 | 1,690 |
| 2001 | 750 | 890 | 1,640 |
| 2002 | 710 | 860 | 1,580 |
| 2003 | 690 | 820 | 1,510 |
| 2004 | 700 | 800 | 1,490 |
| 2005 | 660 | 750 | 1,410 |
| 2006 | 650 | 790 | 1,440 |
| 2007 | 670 | 790 | 1,450 |
| 2008 | 640 | 760 | 1,400 |
Graph 5
| Hourly pay | % membership |
|---|---|
| <£7 | 14% |
| £7 to £10 | 27% |
| £10 to £15 | 36% |
| £15 to £20 | 41% |
| >£20 | 29% |